|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Davidson Measurement Tech Tips
Interpreting Error Statements
This article is dedicated to
clarifying the difference between error statements of Percent of reading
and Percent of full scale. Both measurement and calibration procedures
are affected by the type of error specified so it is important to
realise the implications of those errors.
We will take the example of a sensor with a full scale of 1000 kPa,
however, the information can obviously be applied to other types of
measurement devices such as displacement and vibration sensors etc.
Let's say the error is +/-0.1% FS (full scale), giving an error band of
+/-1kPa. The error of +/-1 kPa (+/-0.1%FS) is applied across the full
range of the device, then as you reduce the pressure, the actual error
for the reading becomes worse as shown below:
|
Pressure applied (kPa) |
Error band |
Percentage error of reading |
|
1000 |
+/-1.0 |
+/-0.1% |
|
750 |
+/-1.0 |
+/-0.13% |
|
500 |
+/-1.0 |
+/-0.20% |
|
250 |
+/-1.0 |
+/-0.40% |
|
100 |
+/-1.0 |
+/-1.0% |
|
50 |
+/-1.0 |
+/-2.0% |
Thus you can see that as your pressure
value moves to the lower end of the scale the actual error as a percent
of the reading increases quite considerably.
Using the same error, this time as a percent of reading rather than full
scale, the values become significantly different. This time we have a
constant percentage error of reading of +/-0.1%. See how the error band
changes to a smaller value:-
|
Pressure applied (kPa) |
Error band |
Percentage error of reading |
|
1000 |
+/-1.0 |
+/-0.1% |
|
750 |
+/-0.75 |
+/-0.1% |
|
500 |
+/-0.5 |
+/-0.1% |
|
250 |
+/-0.25 |
+/-0.10% |
|
100 |
+/-0.10 |
+/-0.1% |
|
50 |
+/-0.05 |
+/-0.1% |
The above is vital when
deciding what calibration device to specify; you need to ensure it
provides you with the best possible accuracy statement to meet the
demands of your measuring parameters.